In addition to Themes A through I (see webpage Themes and Topics) it also possible to submit abstracts to two Special sessions: S1 and S2. A Special session gives a possibility to prominently discuss/present an issue that strictly speaking would not fit (fully) in either of the Themes A through I.
Session S1: Special Session on Real-time water quality monitoring: From scientific play tool to applications in real-life world of water quality management
Monitoring of water quality is traditionally based on laboratory measurements of water samples taken in the field. Emerging technologies are now enhancing possibilities of water quality monitoring. This is due to upcoming availability of high-resolution monitoring information received from sensors, drones and satellites, to be widely available in real time in near future. The large amount of high-resolution monitoring information requires automatic checking, processing and visualising of the required information by means of big-data artificial intelligence algorithms.
Innovation of the water quality monitoring can make monitoring cheaper, although field experience with sensor technology shows that this may not always be the case. The main advantage of using new technology is that, due to the larger resolution in time and space, monitoring data can be more accurate, can be available in real time, and will give more information on pollution sources and hydro-chemical processes.
The anthropogenic impact on surface water quality is often concealed due to natural variability in water temperature, sunlight radiation, and precipitation. Continuous monitoring of water quality with sensors will give a far better average concentration than sampling discontinuously since peak events will be monitored as well. Groundwater quality does not usually change that rapidly in time, but the spatial variability is often high. Soil is a heterogenous medium and groundwater quality (for example nitrate concentrations) can be totally different within several metres. Sensors that can cover a large surface area (like soil scanners from precision agriculture or geophysics) may increase the accuracy in comparison to only taking groundwater samples from boreholes or monitoring wells.
Real-time water quality monitoring using in situ and/or remote sensors is the subject of numerous scientific research programs. However, in the current practice of regional water quality monitoring and everyday water quality management, the application of real-time sensor data is far from common. In this session we want to examine what the consequences and opportunities are when real-time water quality monitoring data are made available for decision makers. What next steps are needed to bring sensor technology from the scientific arena into the real-life world of water management?
The following topics will be discussed:
- Incorporation of real-time monitoring in networks:
What should be done to incorporate real-time water quality monitoring with sensors and remote sensing into regional monitoring networks and everyday water quality management?
- Opportunities of real-time monitoring:
What opportunities appear for water managers when reliable high resolution, real-time water quality data are made available for them
- Barriers for the uptake of real-time monitoring:
What are current barriers for the uptake of real-time water quality technology by water authorities and how can scientist help to overcome these barriers?
- Current practices & experiences with real-time monitoring
Is this practice of sensor data fusion already used and will the power of persuasion be just as high as lab analyses? Most nutrients cannot be measured by a small and affordable sensor and are subject to field laboratories or auto-analysers. The sensors that can be easily applied and are affordable measure the generic parameters like EC, oxygen, pH and turbidity. Sensor data fusion is estimating or modelling the difficult/expensive parameters (like phosphate) using the easy/cheap ones (like conductivity, oxygen, temperature and acidity).
- Reliability of sensor data and proxies:
Can policy makers rely on estimates of sensor data fusion or proxies or will lab analyses still be equally important?
- Sensors and spatial variability in groundwater:
Sensor technology is often used in dynamic environments, like surface water. For monitoring in groundwater, the main challenge is not the variation in time but in space. How can we benefit from the combination of spatial sensors, remote sensing, and precision agriculture technology?
- Combining sensor data, lab analyses and models:
What is, given a certain monitoring objective, the most efficient combination of lab analyses, modelling, and high frequency monitoring? Can a smart combination of real-time monitoring, conventional monitoring, and modelling make monitoring networks more efficient
- Increasing sensor data accuracy and precision:
What agreements should be made to increase the accuracy of sensors and exchangeability of sensor data? Measurements with sensors are often less accurate than laboratory results. Laboratory protocols, work instructions and proficiency testing ensure a high standard in accuracy. Here and there initiatives exist to develop protocols for the use of water-quality sensors. However, these protocols are not yet fully developed and formalised and, therefore, not used in daily practice like they are used in laboratories.
This session will comprise solicited talks, ask for new innovating contributions, and provide particular room for in depth discussion. It is planned to summarize the outcome of this session in a review paper.
This Special Session S1 will be convened by
- Arno Hooijboer, RIVM National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, the Netherlands (email@example.com)
- Joachim Rozemeijer, Deltares, the Netherlands (Joachim.Rozemeijer@deltares.nl)
- Michael Rode, Helmhoz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Germany (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Session S2: Special Session on protection of drinking water resources against nitrate and pesticide pollution
Safe drinking water is vital for human health and the economy. Throughout the EU, diffuse pollution of nitrogen and pesticides from agriculture is the main obstacle to meeting the drinking water quality targets.
The European Commission recently concluded in “The European environment — state and outlook 2020”, that while the environmental policies have helped to improve the environment over recent decades, Europe is not making enough progress and the outlook for the environment in the coming decade is not positive.
A series of governmental and environmental policies were implemented in the EU from the early 1990s onwards to deal with water pollution, including the Drinking Water Directive, Water Framework Directive, the Groundwater Directive, the Nitrates Directive, and the Pesticides Directive.
The complexity and inconsistencies of EU legislation to protect drinking water resources from agricultural pollution come forward most explicitly at the local scale and hamper the achievement of water quality objectives.
Various measures and good practices to improve water quality have been developed and partly implemented in practice at a farm level. To obtain a sustainable system, reduction of inputs of pesticides and fertilizers, farm system redesign (integrated nutrient and pesticide management), point source mitigation and policy measures are essential to be taken into account.
During the LuWQ2022 conference a special session will be held on approaches and measures to protect drinking water resources against nitrate and pesticide pollution.
The aims of Special Session S2 are:
- to present and discuss approaches and measures for protection of drinking water resources against nitrate and pesticide pollution, and
- to identify innovative measures, use of indicators and governance approaches for a more effective drinking water protection.
- To discuss the role of key actors at local, regional and national scale in protection of water resources against pollution.
The following topics will be discussed:
- Decision support tools:
Decision support tools are designed to help end users make more effective decisions on how to act in the most appropriate way to minimize the contamination of drinking water. What are the pros and cons of the different types of decision support tools for reduction of nitrate and pesticide pollution from agriculture?
- Measures to reduce pesticide pollution
What are the most effective measures and practices at farm, local and regional scale to decrease risk of pesticide pollution of drinking water resources.?
- Measures to decrease nitrate pollution
What are the most effective measures and practices at farm, local and regional to decrease risk of nitrate pollution of drinking water resources
- Innovative governance approaches to protect drinking water resources
What are key options for protection of drinking water resources against diffuse pollution of nitrate and pesticides from agriculture and what are the implications of these options for EU policies and governance at different scales?
- Role of stakeholders in addressing challenges:
How can an optimal involvement and engagement of the key actors at local and higher scales help to protect water resources against pollution
- Agri-drinking water indicators (ADWIs):
How can indicators such as inputs of pesticides and nitrogen, nitrogen surplus, and soil measurements help to protect water resources against pollution?
This Special Session S2 will be convened by
- Gerard Velthof, Wageningen Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands (email@example.com)
- Susanne Wuijts, RIVM, the Netherlands, (firstname.lastname@example.org)
- Mart Ros, Wageningen Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands (email@example.com)